lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100903112248Q.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date:	Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:23:53 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	masa-korg@....okisemi.com
Cc:	shemminger@...tta.com, sam@...nborg.org, joe@...ches.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gregory.v.rose@...el.com, mbizon@...ebox.fr,
	kristoffer@...sler.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, john.linn@...inx.com,
	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, davem@...emloft.net, meego-dev@...go.com,
	qi.wang@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com,
	andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
	margie.foster@...el.com, okada533@....okisemi.com,
	morinaga526@....okisemi.com, shimizu394@....okisemi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Gigabit Ethernet driver of Topcliff PCH

On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:15:22 +0900
Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@....okisemi.com> wrote:

> Gigabit Ethernet driver of Topcliff PCH
> Patch created against 2.6.35
> 
> Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus. 
> Topcliff PCH has Gigabit Ethernet I/F. Using this I/F, it is able to 
> access system devices connected to Gigabit Ethernet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/Kconfig                   |   10 +
>  drivers/net/Makefile                  |    1 +
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/Makefile          |    4 +
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe.h         |  683 +++++++++
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_api.c     |  246 ++++
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_api.h     |   34 +
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_ethtool.c |  618 ++++++++
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_main.c    | 2591 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_param.c   |  519 +++++++
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_phy.c     |  276 ++++
>  drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_phy.h     |   35 +
>  11 files changed, 5017 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_api.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_api.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_ethtool.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_main.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_param.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_phy.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_phy.h

(snip)

> +/**
> + * pch_gbe_unmap_and_free_rx_resource - Unmap and free rx socket buffer
> + * @adapter:      Board private structure
> + * @buffer_info:  Buffer information structure
> + */
> +static void pch_gbe_unmap_and_free_rx_resource(
> +					struct pch_gbe_adapter *adapter,
> +					struct pch_gbe_buffer *buffer_info)
> +{
> +	if (buffer_info->dma) {
> +		pci_unmap_single(adapter->pdev, buffer_info->dma,
> +				 buffer_info->length, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> +		buffer_info->dma = 0;

Probably, this trick doesn't work because zero could be a valid DMA
address on some architctures.


> +	/*-- Set Buffer infomation --*/
> +	buffer_info->length = skb->len;
> +	buffer_info->dma =
> +	    pci_map_single(adapter->pdev, skb->data, buffer_info->length,
> +			   PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);

Needs to handle mapping failure (dma_mapping_errro)?

I found the same problems in other places.


Can you use dma_map_* API instead of pci_map_*? Please read:

Documentation/DMA-API.txt
Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt


Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ