| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100903044656.GA6589@nowhere> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:46:58 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> To: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rostedt@...dmis.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, nhorman@...driver.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, scott.a.mcmillan@...el.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] netdev: show a process of packets On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:55:04AM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote: > (2010/09/03 11:17), David Miller wrote: > > From: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com> > > Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:51 +0900 > > > >> Thanks many acks. and I have one question. > >> > >> These patches have several component. > >> > >> Patch1 is kernel component, but patch2-5 are netdev component. > >> What tree is good to be included ? > >> If it is not net-next, I must rebase to another tree. > > > > I would prefer it goes into the tracing tree or whatever is the most appropriate > > for patch #1. > > > > O.K. I'll rebase to linux-2.6-tip. No need, they apply very well :) I'll push that to -tip soon. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists