[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C8083D5.200@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:12:53 +0900
From: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, scott.a.mcmillan@...el.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] netdev: show a process of packets
(2010/09/03 13:46), Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:55:04AM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote:
>> (2010/09/03 11:17), David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:51 +0900
>>>
>>>> Thanks many acks. and I have one question.
>>>>
>>>> These patches have several component.
>>>>
>>>> Patch1 is kernel component, but patch2-5 are netdev component.
>>>> What tree is good to be included ?
>>>> If it is not net-next, I must rebase to another tree.
>>>
>>> I would prefer it goes into the tracing tree or whatever is the most appropriate
>>> for patch #1.
>>>
>>
>> O.K. I'll rebase to linux-2.6-tip.
>
>
> No need, they apply very well :)
>
> I'll push that to -tip soon.
>
> Thanks.
>
O.K. Thanks!
Koki Sanagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists