| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1283772443.15944.1320.camel@mulgrave.site> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:27:23 -0400 From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de> To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Chetan Loke <chetanloke@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>, scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, James Bottomley > <James.Bottomley@...e.de> wrote: > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > So, please understand that code and project workflow is only one of the > > > reasons why TCM/LIO v4 was selected over SCST. > > > > It isn't yet ... your code still has to be reviewed properly. My > > preferred reviewer is currently honing his skills on a diet of raw beef > > in Argentina, but hopefully he'll get around to it shortly. > > The SCST developers and the SCST users will definitely appreciate it > if review efforts will be spread evenly over both projects. SCST isn't at the starting gate yet, so there's nothing currently to review. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists