[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C84D02A.7070508@superonline.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:27:38 -0400
From: "M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@...eronline.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: Important news regarding the two different patches
On 05/09/10 10:08 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> ok, thanks. probably I've catched your point. please feel free to use my reviewed-by
>>> for your fix.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> In the meantime, though, I prepared a patch that should address the issue
>> entirely. The patch is appended and if it looks good to you, I'd rather use it
>> instead of the previous one (it is still untested).
>
> Yeah, this one looks nicer to me :)
>
> Thanks, rafael!
Dear Rafael Wysocki, Kosaki Motohiro and Minchan Kim,
Upon Kosaki Motohiro's kind request via an off-list e-mail,
I tested the following two patches separately with a vanilla
2.6.35.4 kernel:
Patch 1:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/5/86
Patch 2:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/9/4/4615426
The first of these was prepared by Minchan Kim, and it fixes
the issue; i.e. no hangs during hibernation with a full tmpfs.
However, the second patch, prepared by Rafael Wysocki, does *not*
fix the problem. I still experience hangs with a full tmpfs upon
hibernation.
As always, I am willing to test newer patches and help in debugging
this issue.
I really appreciate all of your help,
M. Vefa Bicakci
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists