[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C84D1CE.3070205@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:34:38 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: disabling group leader perf_event
On 09/06/2010 02:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 12:12 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> If I read the code correctly, disabling a group leader perf_event will
>> disable the entire group.
>>
>> Is this correct?
> Yeah, pretty much.
Well, I never liked group_leader style APIs. I like different types for
the container and the contained. But such is not unix.
>> If so, how can I disable just the event itself? Can I allocate a dummy
>> invent for the group leader so I can enable and disable each perf_event
>> in the group individually?
> Which makes me wonder why you use groups in the first place.
Basically, to read() all events in one go. I have many of them.
My current problem is that I have an event (kvm_exit) which I want to
drill down by looking at a field (exit_reason). So I create lots of
separate perf_events with a filter for each reason:
kvm_exit(exit_reason==0), kvm_exit(exit_reason==1), etc. But filters
are fairly slow (can have ~60 such events on AMD), so I want to make
this drill-down optional.
Current plan is to have a group for the basic events and another group
for the drilldown events (each per-cpu), and activate the drilldown
group on user request. perf will be able to schedule both groups
concurrently since they only contain tracepoints, yes?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists