[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Osf0g-0005it-BZ@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:57:34 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ovl: small optimisation for ovl_lookup
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, NeilBrown wrote:
> If we find a non-directory in the upper layer, there is no point
> performing a lookup in the lower layer as whatever is found will just
> be ignored anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> ---
> fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.c b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.c
> index 0fe3944..0ddfeec 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.c
> @@ -495,7 +495,8 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> dput(upperdentry);
> upperdentry = NULL;
> ue->opaque = true;
> - }
> + } else if (!S_ISDIR(upperdentry->d_inode->i_mode))
> + ue->opaque = true;
Setting opaque unconditionally, without checking whether the lower
file exists or not, means on unlink we'll create a whiteout even when
not necessary.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists