linux-kernel - Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 1/3] memory hotplug: fix next block calculation in is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Sep 2010 02:15:01 +0900
From:	Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	andi.kleen@...el.com, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 1/3] memory hotplug: fix next block calculation in is_removable

2010/9/6 Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:42:28PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>
>> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> next_active_pageblock() is for finding next _used_ freeblock. It skips
>> several blocks when it finds there are a chunk of free pages lager than
>> pageblock. But it has 2 bugs.
>>
>>   1. We have no lock. page_order(page) - pageblock_order can be minus.
>>   2. pageblocks_stride += is wrong. it should skip page_order(p) of pages.
>>
>> CC: stable@...nel.org
>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/memory_hotplug.c |   16 ++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: kametest/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- kametest.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ kametest/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -584,19 +584,19 @@ static inline int pageblock_free(struct
>>  /* Return the start of the next active pageblock after a given page */
>>  static struct page *next_active_pageblock(struct page *page)
>>  {
>> -     int pageblocks_stride;
>> -
>>       /* Ensure the starting page is pageblock-aligned */
>>       BUG_ON(page_to_pfn(page) & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1));
>>
>> -     /* Move forward by at least 1 * pageblock_nr_pages */
>> -     pageblocks_stride = 1;
>> -
>>       /* If the entire pageblock is free, move to the end of free page */
>> -     if (pageblock_free(page))
>> -             pageblocks_stride += page_order(page) - pageblock_order;
>> +     if (pageblock_free(page)) {
>> +             int order;
>> +             /* be careful. we don't have locks, page_order can be changed.*/
>> +             order = page_order(page);
>> +             if (order > pageblock_order)
>> +                     return page + (1 << order);
>> +     }
>
> As you note in your changelog, page_order() is unsafe because we do not have
> the zone lock but you don't check if order is somewhere between pageblock_order
> and MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES. How is this safer?
>
Ah, I missed that.

if ((pageblock_order <= order) && (order < MAX_ORDER))
          return page + (1 << order);
ok ?

Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/