[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87aanu39ev.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:27:04 +0100
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (ACPI idle?)
On 6 Sep 2010, Damien Wyart told this:
> I think this is related to what has been discussed in this thread:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/14/11
Quite possibly :/ though I'm on x86-64, not x86, and certainly don't
have kmemleak turne don.
> I've not seen the problem with 2.6.35.4 yet, and only once with
> 2.6.35.3. Zeno said it disappeared for him when he started to use
> 2.6.35-stable.
Argh.
> So if you can reproduce it quite easily, I guess bisection (even
> painful) will be the best way to get (hopefuly) an idea of where the
> problem might come from...
'Quite easily' is not quite true. It does not show up in qemu -kernel.
It does not show up if you boot straight to an emergency boot shell
in the initramfs (I was trying to avoid activating the RAID arrays).
So I guess it's a full-blown boot each time, which is made pointlessly
difficult by the fact that the rpc.mountd on my NFS server is acting up,
giving me -ESTALE half the time for an initial mount (??!!!) and thus
totally buggering up my client system whenever I reboot. So I may have
to debug *that* first. What fun.
But I'll get around to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists