linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (ACPI idle?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100906053255.GA23340@brouette>
Date:	Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:32:55 +0200
From:	Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
To:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to
 unusability (ACPI idle?)

Hello,

* Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk> [2010-09-05 01:51]:
> This is a preliminary report: I haven't bisected this problem yet, or
> isolated it in any significant fashion.

> What I can say is this.

> In 2.6.35.3, but not in 2.6.34.1, some of my systems experience an
> increasingly severe series of stalls whenever the system is idle. The
> stalls get worse at a rate above linear: about fifty seconds after they
> start, I am waiting five to ten seconds for responses to keystrokes. It
> is very hard to get anything much done in this situation: even
> restarting is hard. 'perf top' shows nothing using the time, but the
> load average is pegged at 1.

> I can verify that this does not happen on my embedded Geode box, a
> 32-bit system without ACPI support. It does happen on my x86-64 systems,
> all of which are running 64-bit kernels with ACPI. These systems are all
> running with CONFIG_NOHZ, so I tried turning it off. The problem got
> enormously worse: the kernel lasted 6.4 seconds after initial boot and
> about two seconds after entering userspace before stalling completely.

I think this is related to what has been discussed in this thread:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/14/11

I've not seen the problem with 2.6.35.4 yet, and only once with
2.6.35.3. Zeno said it disappeared for him when he started to use
2.6.35-stable.

So if you can reproduce it quite easily, I guess bisection (even
painful) will be the best way to get (hopefuly) an idea of where the
problem might come from...

-- 
Damien Wyart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/