[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100906210905.GB5863@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:09:05 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Pawel Osciak <p.osciak@...sung.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 0/9] CMA + VCMM integration
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:33:50AM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This patchset introduces a draft of a redesign of Zach Pfeffer's
> VCMM.
What is a VCMM?
What is a CMA?
> Not all of the functionality of the original VCMM has been
> ported into this patchset. This is mostly meant as RFC. Moreover,
> the code for VCMM implementation in this RFC has not been tested.
If you haven't even tested it, why should we review it?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists