[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <op.vim2x8i87p4s8u@localhost>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:40:46 +0200
From: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Pawel Osciak <p.osciak@...sung.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 0/9] CMA + VCMM integration
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:09:05 +0200, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:33:50AM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> This patchset introduces a draft of a redesign of Zach Pfeffer's
>> VCMM.
>
> What is a VCMM?
Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager. The version posted by Zach can
be found at: <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/50090>.
It is an API for managing IO MMU and IO MMU mappings.
> What is a CMA?
Contiguous Memory Manager. The v4 version can be found at
<http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128229799415817&w=2>. It is an API for
allocating large, physically contiguous blocks of memory.
I haven't expected that anyone who haven't already participated in the
discussion about CMA and VCMM will get interested by this patchset
so I was a bit vague in the cover letter. Sorry about that.
>> Not all of the functionality of the original VCMM has been
>> ported into this patchset. This is mostly meant as RFC. Moreover,
>> the code for VCMM implementation in this RFC has not been tested.
> If you haven't even tested it, why should we review it?
Ignore the code then and look just at the documentation, please.
I wanted to post what I have to receive comments about the general
idea and not necessarily the code itself. Code is just a mean to show
how I see the implementation of the idea described in the documentation.
Because of all that, I marked the patchset as a RFC rather than a PATCH.
--
Best regards, _ _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists