linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: Fix kernel oops with g

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTins336XV97o=72YdqLf1Gr_hA9NjMNqcaWDosfK@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:12:07 +0400
From:	Maxim Osipov <maxim.osipov@...il.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, "Gadiyar, Anand" <gadiyar@...com>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: Fix kernel oops with g_ether and Windows

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com> wrote:
>
>   It was caught by me on the list too, right at the same day the patch was
> posted. The author remained silent though...
>

Sorry for being silent - I had lots of things to do. Regarding the
patch itself - I respect kernel coding conventions, but I think it is
bad to have two different code styles in one file. Note, this is my
personal opinion only.

Kind regards,
Maxim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/