lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:37:59 +0900 From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> Cc: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@...sung.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/spi_s3c64xx: Move to subsys_initcall() On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:55:39PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Mark Brown >> <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: >> > Allow the use of the S3C64xx SPI controller with things like PMICs by >> > moving the init up to subsys_initcall(). > >> Couldn't any user ever need to load it as a module? >> If no, we might as well drop the s3c64xx_spi_exit and s3c64xx_spi_remove > > This doesn't prevent building as a module - when built as a module > subsys_initcall() is identical to module_init(), the change will only > affect the order in which things are done when the code is built into > the kernel otherwise it's a noop. I didn't know that, thanks for the info. Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@...sung.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists