[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283954177.23762.24.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:56:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: paulus <paulus@...ba.org>,
stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/19] perf: Per cpu-context rotation timer
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 15:50 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Because some people (Corey) want to be able to have different rotation
> > periods per pmu driver, so a timer per context was the easy way out.
>
> Makes sense. If you want it fully aligned with the tick, then you just
> might get the real tick time from the tick code and make it proper
> aligned.
Right, I'll go see if I can make that work nicely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists