[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100910043952.GA9100@drongo>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:39:52 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/19] perf pmu interface changes -v4
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:46:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> These patches prepare the perf code for multiple PMUs.
>
> About the first half of these patches deals with removing all the weak
> functions, the second half provides per pmu contexts.
>
> New to the first half is Alpha, which got merged into mainline recently.
>
> The second half is completely new and lightly tested, one known breakage is
> that it currently doesn't allow to mix software and hardware events into a
> single group (should be fixed soon).
I see Ingo committed this series into the tip perf/core branch. Did
this problem get fixed before that, or does it still need to be fixed?
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists