linux-kernel - Re: Is via-velocity broken in 2.6.34?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=-o68GqqvOeQgEBThBJo=v2kUEy4+VDU14b3us@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:05:08 -0700
From:	Matt Causey <matt.causey@...il.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is via-velocity broken in 2.6.34?

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> wrote:
> Please Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org

Done, cheers for that I didn't know.

>
> Matt Causey <matt.causey@...il.com> :
> [2.6.29 -> 2.6.34 regression]
>> Attached is debug.tar.  It contains dmesg, config.gz, ethtool,
>> ifconfig, and lspci output.  I'm not sure what else to do at this
>> point.  Is there some debugging I can enable in the kernel to give
>> more clues as to what's gone wrong?
>
> Any chance you could bisect the regression or narrow it down a bit ?
>

I've never bisected before.  But I'll lookup some documentation and
give it a go.  :-)

> Otherwise may I assume that there is no difference in the
> userspace tools (just in case) ?
>

That's a valid assumption.  The userland was exactly the same, just
different kernel version.

--
Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/