[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C8ABF15.8000108@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:28:21 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com,
robert.richter@....com, acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH percpu#for-next] percpu: clear memory allocated with the
km allocator
On 09/10/2010 06:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:55:18 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 10:52 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> Percpu allocator should clear memory before returning it but the km
>>>> allocator forgot to do it. Fix it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>>>> Spotted-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>>
>>> (fwiw, -tip uses Reported-by)
>>
>> fyi, Documentation/SubmittingPatches does also.
>
> Yeah, and, FYI, there's observed strong correlation between the
> maintenance policies of -tip and Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
> [i'd even venture so far to claim causation]
Oh, I already updated it to be Reported-by. I use Spotted-by when to
distinguish the cases where the root cause is diagnosed by the
reporter as opposed to when the reporter just reported a bug but I
suppose it's just causing more confusion. I'll just use Reproted-by
from now on.
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists