[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <704982.67431.qm@web180312.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usbnet: do not count empty skbs as errors in rx_process()
--- On Fri, 9/10/10, Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org> wrote:
> From: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] usbnet: do not count empty skbs as errors in rx_process()
NAK to this backwards-incompatible change.
At this point there's no way to know how many
drivers it breaks ... I do know that counting
such SKBs as errors has previously turned up
link-level errors, and thus led to bugfixes.
> If rx_fixup() returns an empty skb
> (because it consumed all data inside),
The canonical reason the SKB would be empty is
because after rx_fixup() removed all header and
trailer data, there was no packet body left.
Which is likely a link error, and has been
worth accounting as such in the past (turned up
bugs on TX or RX sides).
> do not count it as error.
>
> This is needed for cx82310_eth.
I'd far rather see that driver fixed, than see
the core usbnet framework broken to avoid such
fixes to a very new driver ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists