linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: don't compile with gcc-3.3.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1284367195.2275.29.camel@laptop>
Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:39:55 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	florian@...kler.org
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: don't compile with gcc-3.3.3

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:31 +0200, florian@...kler.org wrote:
> hpa commented on bug 16506[1] :
> "Please note that gcc-3.3.3 is known broken on x86; gcc-3.4 is the oldest
> version which is known to *not* be broken."
> 
> References: 
> 	[0]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16633
> 	[1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506#c28
> 
> If that is indeed so, we should abort the build? No?

Does it in fact still build with 3.4? I seem to recall some talk about
pushing the minimum version to 4.x for x86, although I can't remember
where..


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/