[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1284369373.14710.11.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:16:13 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/2] sched: dynamically adapt granularity with
nr_running
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:35 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:08 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > We need a better fork fairness gizmo.
>
> Proper zero-lag insertion would do. Much sadness in that tracking that
> costs a u64 mult per enqueu/dequeue and using it adds a s64 div.
(math _sucks_:)
> But if you want, have a play with:
maximum latency: 48475.3 µs
average latency: 6881.4 µs
missed timer events: 0
Darn.
make -j3 is gaining a tad over a hog as well, roughly the same as
turning START_DEBIT off.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists