[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284370660.2275.86.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:37:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/2] sched: dynamically adapt granularity with
nr_running
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:16 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:35 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:08 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > We need a better fork fairness gizmo.
> >
> > Proper zero-lag insertion would do. Much sadness in that tracking that
> > costs a u64 mult per enqueu/dequeue and using it adds a s64 div.
>
> (math _sucks_:)
>
> > But if you want, have a play with:
>
> maximum latency: 48475.3 µs
> average latency: 6881.4 µs
> missed timer events: 0
>
> Darn.
>
> make -j3 is gaining a tad over a hog as well, roughly the same as
> turning START_DEBIT off.
Hrmm,. could it be fair_sleeper muck placing too many tasks too far left
on wakeup starving others?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists