[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100913182838.70aa0964@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:28:38 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: don't compile with gcc-3.3.3
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:21:05 +0200
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:56:39 -0700
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> > On 09/13/2010 01:39 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > The only reason to not abort the build for gcc 3.3.3 is that soem
> > "enterprise" distros have been shipping gcc 3.3.3 with backported fixes
> > from 3.4, which of course still identifies themselves as gcc 3.3.3, and
> > so technically it is iompossioble to tell if any particular "gcc 3.3.3"
> > is actually broken or not.
What about issuing a warning like
"gcc 3.3.3 is broken because of bug [bugdescription/url].
if you know your build is not affected by this bug do:
touch .gcc333bugfixNNNN but please be aware that you are
not supported by the mainline kernel development comunity
if you do"
and implementing the accompanying logic?
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists