[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1284407432.8171.41.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:50:32 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...il.com>,
Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>,
Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lio-target: Add support for libcrypto crc32c and
crc32-intel offload
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:21 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> >
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > This patch series converts the LIO-Target fabric module from using a legacy
> > internal slicing by 1x CRC32C algorithm to the slicing by 1x CRC32C available in
> > crc32c.ko, as well as initial support for the Nehalem series crc32c-intel.ko
> > instruction offload available since v2.6.27 in late 2008.
> >
> > So far this series has been lightly tested with a handful of Open-iSCSI client VMs
> > with the optimized crc32c-intel.ko offload case, and there appears to be some
> > HeaderDigest failures for one case with RHEL6 B2 x86_64, while Ubuntu i686 on
> > v2.6.27 and OpenSuse 11.2 x86_64 on v2.6.31 work as expected with HeaderDigest=CRC32C
> > and DataDigest=CRC32C using the offload on the LIO-Target side.
> >
> > Currently this patch disables the new iSCSI TPG attribute crc32c_x86_offload
> > to force the crc32c.ko slicing by x1 CRC32C algorithm until these compatibility
> > issues with existing libcrc32c clients can be properly resolved with the Nehalem
> > CRC32C offload instructions running on the LIO-Target side.
> >
> Due to a customer issue I had to revisit the CRC32 issue recently.
> And according to you the main reason for using your own CRC routines
> had been endianness issues.
Indeed, this has historically been the case for LIO-Target and
Core-iSCSI. I noticed the issue with libcrypto while porting the latter
on a old G4 TI-book waaay back during v2.6.10-rc3 days.
> IE the in-kernel crc32c routines apparently weren't able to
> calculate the checksum in an endianness-independent manner.
> So a CRC calculated on a BE machine would fail to be validated by a
> LE machine and vice versa.
>
> Has this been fixed / verified?
>
>>From taking a look at crypto/crc32c.c it still appears AFAICT to not be
big endian safe. I was planning to test this patch on some powerpc/ppc
hardware with v2.6.36-rc4 in the next days, but it looks like
lio-core-2.6.git will need a seperate crypto/crc32c.c patch to function
properly on big endian arches.
Thanks for mentioning this point Hannes!
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists