[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C8E8AF5.5080205@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:35:01 -0500
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
CC: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...il.com>,
Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>,
Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lio-target: Add support for libcrypto crc32c and
crc32-intel offload
On 09/13/2010 02:50 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>> IE the in-kernel crc32c routines apparently weren't able to
>> calculate the checksum in an endianness-independent manner.
>> So a CRC calculated on a BE machine would fail to be validated by a
>> LE machine and vice versa.
>>
>> Has this been fixed / verified?
>>
>
>> From taking a look at crypto/crc32c.c it still appears AFAICT to not be
> big endian safe. I was planning to test this patch on some powerpc/ppc
> hardware with v2.6.36-rc4 in the next days, but it looks like
> lio-core-2.6.git will need a seperate crypto/crc32c.c patch to function
> properly on big endian arches.
>
There was this bug that was fixed a couple years ago:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ef19454bd437b2ba14c9cda1de85debd9f383484
since then I think we have not had problems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists