[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Ov3wR-0000Ua-LC@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:59:07 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, adilger@....com,
corbet@....net, npiggin@...nel.dk, hooanon05@...oo.co.jp,
bfields@...ldses.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
sfrench@...ibm.com, philippe.deniel@....FR,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V19 00/15] Generic name to handle and open by handle
syscalls
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Neil Brown wrote:
> > You can implement ->read() on the symlink file instead.
>
> I would suggest that is a much uglier hack than changed readlinkat to accept
> a NULL pathname.
I think read(2) is a natural interface for reading symlinks and would
have been a perfectly fine API to choose instead of a specialized
syscall.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists