linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] lm75: some optimisations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100913100305.28542955@hyperion.delvare>
Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:03:05 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>,
	Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@...com>,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] lm75: some optimisations

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:10:00 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:11:28 +0200, Jean Delvare said:
> 
> > Please do NOT CC linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org. We have a mailing list
> > dedicated to hardware monitoring, there's no point to add to the 200,000
> > messages (literally) LKML gets every year. The more messages a list
> > gets, the fewer readers it has.
> 
> Any way to represent this in the MAINTAINERS file, so that people who come
> along in the fugure know that lm-sensors gets special handling in that regard?

Unfortunately not. The only way would be to convince the maintainers of
scripts/get_maintainer.pl to NOT unconditionally add LKML to its output.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/