[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284483745.13351.71.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:02:25 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host
kernel
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 18:29 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Precisely. This is what the patch from Xin Xiaohui does. That code
> already seems to do most of what you are trying to do, right?
I thought host pins guest kernel buffer pages was good enough for TX
thought I didn't look up xiaohui's vhost asycn io patch in details.
What's the performance data Xiaohui got from using kiocb? I haven't seen
any performance number from him yet.
> The main thing missing seems to be macvtap integration, so that we can
> fall back
> on data copy if zero copy is unavailable?
> How hard would it be to basically link the mp and macvtap modules
> together to get us this functionality? Anyone?
The simple integration is using macvtap + xiaohui's vhost asycn io
patch. I can make a try for TX only.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists