[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C8FB58F.8010706@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:49:03 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SLUB: Fix merged slab cache names
On 14.9.2010 20.47, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
>>> Put this into mm/slub.c as slub only flag? What is the difference from
>>> refcount == 1?
>> I can put it in mm/slub.c but I was worried about someone reusing the bit for
>> something else.
> Allocate from the other end like __OBJECT_POISON.
I'll do that. Thanks!
>> Do you mean refcount == 2? You don't know during kmem cache release time if
>> someone was merged to the cache or not.
>>> Ok. Keeping the original name. Why dont we do strdup by default and always
>>> do a kfree(s->name) on close?
>>>
>> I tried that. It gets very nasty during bootstrap.
> Add it only to kmem_cache_create() not to kmem_cache_open. That is not
> used during bootstrap. The bootstrap caches do not matter since they are
> never freed
I tried that too. It doesn't work because we get merged to kmalloc
caches and can't do kfree() on them.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists