[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284492983.13351.95.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:36:23 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host
kernel
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 21:01 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > I think that you should be able to simply combine
> > > the two drivers together, add an ioctl to
> > > enable/disable zero copy mode of operation.
> >
> > That could work. But what's the purpose to have two drivers if one
> > driver can handle it?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Shirley
>
> This was just an idea: I thought it's a good way for people interested
> in this zero copy thing to combine forces and avoid making
> the same mistakes, but it's not a must of course.
Ok, I will make a simple patch by reusing Xiaohui's some vhost code on
handling vhost_add_used_and_signal() to see any performance changes.
The interesting thing here when I run 32 instances netperf/netserver I
didn't see any issue w/i this patch.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists