[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100914193449.GA9797@lenovo>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:34:49 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/6] x86, NMI, Add support to notify hardware error with
unknown NMI
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 02:21:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
...
> The proper approach would be not to add hacks to the NMI code but to
> implement southbridge drivers - which would also have NMI callbacks.
> These are unchartered waters, but variance in that space is reducing
> systematically so it would be worth a shot.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Hi Ingo,
while there is a conversation about makeing NMI handler robust/modern or
whatever, I think the naming Huang has implemented for NMI Stat&Ctrl
registers/ports look quite good and convenient (I thought about this times
ago when being merging nmi-32/64 code but didn't implemented it properly).
So I presume perhaps we could merge this snippets first? Or I miss something
on discussion in general?
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists