[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100913.201730.27805132.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mashirle@...ibm.com
Cc: avi@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, mst@...hat.com,
xiaohui.xin@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host
kernel
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:48:03 -0700
> + base = (unsigned long)from->iov_base + offset1;
> + size = ((base & ~PAGE_MASK) + len + ~PAGE_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + num_pages = get_user_pages_fast(base, size, 0, &page[i]);
> + if ((num_pages != size) ||
> + (num_pages > MAX_SKB_FRAGS - skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags))
> + /* put_page is in skb free */
> + return -EFAULT;
What keeps the user from writing to these pages in it's address space
after the write call returns?
A write() return of success means:
"I wrote what you gave to me"
not
"I wrote what you gave to me, oh and BTW don't touch these
pages for a while."
In fact "a while" isn't even defined in any way, as there is no way
for the write() invoker to know when the networking card is done with
those pages.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists