[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100915140246.GA25983@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:02:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: START_NICE feature (temporarily niced forks)
(v3)
* Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:22 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> >
> > > Tangent: cgroups with classification user/pgid
> > >
> > > taskset -c 3 ./wakeup-latency& sleep 30 && killall wakeup-latency
> > > (taskset -c 3 make -j10 running)
> > >
> > > maximum latency: 256.5 µs
> > > average latency: 25.7 µs
> > > missed timer events: 0
> > >
> > > Rather spiffy for this case.
> >
> > Ouch, nothing beats proper segregation of workloads.
> >
> > It would be _really_ nice to get that automatically somehow, for make -j
> > jobs. Perhaps a per tty auto-cgroup-classification kernel feature?
> >
> > We cannot really rely on distros to pull this off.
>
> Dunno, wasn't hard.
Renicing a make -j 10 isnt hard either - still people/apps dont do it
:-/
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists