[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1284633047.9142.55.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:30:47 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: START_NICE feature (temporarily niced
forks) (v3)
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16:02 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:22 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tangent: cgroups with classification user/pgid
> > > >
> > > > taskset -c 3 ./wakeup-latency& sleep 30 && killall wakeup-latency
> > > > (taskset -c 3 make -j10 running)
> > > >
> > > > maximum latency: 256.5 µs
> > > > average latency: 25.7 µs
> > > > missed timer events: 0
> > > >
> > > > Rather spiffy for this case.
> > >
> > > Ouch, nothing beats proper segregation of workloads.
> > >
> > > It would be _really_ nice to get that automatically somehow, for make -j
> > > jobs. Perhaps a per tty auto-cgroup-classification kernel feature?
> > >
> > > We cannot really rely on distros to pull this off.
> >
> > Dunno, wasn't hard.
>
> Renicing a make -j 10 isnt hard either - still people/apps dont do it
> :-/
True. I'll put resurrect/tinker usersched back on good intentions list.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists