[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100915065345.GC3393@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:53:45 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc: "Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"Gadiyar, Anand" <gadiyar@...com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND/PATCH 5/6] USB: musb-gadget: complete request only if
data is transfered over
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:51:09PM -0500, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>>> If a DMA interrupt comes when the whole transfer is not yet
>>> complete (and
>>> other Ming Lei's patches are making this possible),
>
> Oh, here I mixed some other patch with Ming Lei's ones...
>
>>> it will pass due to the
>
>> than this is the actual problem, no ? If we're using mode1 dma (as we
>> are on tx path), we should only get dma interrupt when the whole
>> transfer has been completed.
>
> The Inventra DMA controller has serious DMA length limitation, so the whole
>transfer may take more than one DMA.
When I said 'whole transfer' I meant the transfer size you programmed
dma to transfer, see that we have (not actual code):
if (transfer_size > dma->max_len)
transfer_size = dma->max_len;
dma->channel_program(...,..., transfer_size,...);
with mode1, we will only get irq when dma has transferred transfer_size
bytes.
>> likewise, this was there before the patch. I don't think the real
>> problem lies with this patch, it's been there for a while, don't you
>> agree ?
>
> Then what problem this patch fixes, if not this one?
if request->length == 1MB and dma->max_len = 128KB, when is_dma is true,
request->actual will be different from request->length for 7
'iterations', then only on the 8th it will be the same. I believe that's
what Ming is trying to fix.
Ming, am I correct ?
> Let me repeat: in the PIO mode the added check is just duplicate, in the DMA
it is duplicate for PIO, but not for DMA.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists