linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] Interrupt latency on some 945GM platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:50:43 +0300
From:	Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc:	Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@...lan.co.uk>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Interrupt latency on some 945GM platforms

В сообщении от 17 of September 2010 19:30:26 автор Jesse Barnes написал:
> Yeah if that works we could definitely add some qos calls to the driver. 
> When vblanks are alive we'd need a latency less tha the refresh rate, and
> when commands are oustanding we'd probably want it even lower.
> 
> Vasily, can you try the qos workaround on your machine and see if it works
> too?
> 
> Thanks,

Just give me a patch :)

Regards
Vasily

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)