[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100918191259.057161869@clark.site>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:11:59 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Alex Elder <aelder@....com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Subject: [021/129] xfs: move aio completion after unwritten extent conversion
2.6.35-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
commit fb511f2150174b18b28ad54708c1adda0df39b17 upstream.
If we write into an unwritten extent using AIO we need to complete the AIO
request after the extent conversion has finished. Without that a read could
race to see see the extent still unwritten and return zeros. For synchronous
I/O we already take care of that by flushing the xfsconvertd workqueue (which
might be a bit of overkill).
To do that add iocb and result fields to struct xfs_ioend, so that we can
call aio_complete from xfs_end_io after the extent conversion has happened.
Note that we need a new result field as io_error is used for positive errno
values, while the AIO code can return negative error values and positive
transfer sizes.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@....com>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
@@ -275,8 +275,11 @@ xfs_end_io(
xfs_finish_ioend(ioend, 0);
/* ensure we don't spin on blocked ioends */
delay(1);
- } else
+ } else {
+ if (ioend->io_iocb)
+ aio_complete(ioend->io_iocb, ioend->io_result, 0);
xfs_destroy_ioend(ioend);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -309,6 +312,8 @@ xfs_alloc_ioend(
atomic_inc(&XFS_I(ioend->io_inode)->i_iocount);
ioend->io_offset = 0;
ioend->io_size = 0;
+ ioend->io_iocb = NULL;
+ ioend->io_result = 0;
INIT_WORK(&ioend->io_work, xfs_end_io);
return ioend;
@@ -1604,6 +1609,7 @@ xfs_end_io_direct(
bool is_async)
{
xfs_ioend_t *ioend = iocb->private;
+ bool complete_aio = is_async;
/*
* Non-NULL private data means we need to issue a transaction to
@@ -1629,7 +1635,14 @@ xfs_end_io_direct(
if (ioend->io_type == IO_READ) {
xfs_finish_ioend(ioend, 0);
} else if (private && size > 0) {
- xfs_finish_ioend(ioend, is_sync_kiocb(iocb));
+ if (is_async) {
+ ioend->io_iocb = iocb;
+ ioend->io_result = ret;
+ complete_aio = false;
+ xfs_finish_ioend(ioend, 0);
+ } else {
+ xfs_finish_ioend(ioend, 1);
+ }
} else {
/*
* A direct I/O write ioend starts it's life in unwritten
@@ -1648,7 +1661,7 @@ xfs_end_io_direct(
*/
iocb->private = NULL;
- if (is_async)
+ if (complete_aio)
aio_complete(iocb, ret, 0);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists