lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100918191258.972260079@clark.site>
Date:	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:11:58 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>,
	"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Subject: [020/129] ext4: move aio completion after unwritten extent conversion

2.6.35-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>

commit 5b3ff237bef43b9e7fb7d1eb858e29b73fd664f9 upstream.

This patch is to be applied upon Christoph's "direct-io: move aio_complete
into ->end_io" patch. It adds iocb and result fields to struct ext4_io_end_t,
so that we can call aio_complete from  ext4_end_io_nolock() after the extent
conversion has finished.

I have verified with Christoph's aio-dio test that used to fail after a few
runs on an original kernel but now succeeds on the patched kernel.

See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/19659 for details.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h  |    4 +++-
 fs/ext4/inode.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -167,13 +167,15 @@ struct mpage_da_data {
 };
 #define	EXT4_IO_UNWRITTEN	0x1
 typedef struct ext4_io_end {
-	struct list_head	list;		/* per-file finished AIO list */
+	struct list_head	list;		/* per-file finished IO list */
 	struct inode		*inode;		/* file being written to */
 	unsigned int		flag;		/* unwritten or not */
 	struct page		*page;		/* page struct for buffer write */
 	loff_t			offset;		/* offset in the file */
 	ssize_t			size;		/* size of the extent */
 	struct work_struct	work;		/* data work queue */
+	struct kiocb		*iocb;		/* iocb struct for AIO */
+	int			result;		/* error value for AIO */
 } ext4_io_end_t;
 
 /*
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3668,6 +3668,8 @@ static int ext4_end_io_nolock(ext4_io_en
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	if (io->iocb)
+		aio_complete(io->iocb, io->result, 0);
 	/* clear the DIO AIO unwritten flag */
 	io->flag = 0;
 	return ret;
@@ -3767,6 +3769,8 @@ static ext4_io_end_t *ext4_init_io_end (
 		io->offset = 0;
 		io->size = 0;
 		io->page = NULL;
+		io->iocb = NULL;
+		io->result = 0;
 		INIT_WORK(&io->work, ext4_end_io_work);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&io->list);
 	}
@@ -3796,12 +3800,18 @@ static void ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb
 	if (io_end->flag != EXT4_IO_UNWRITTEN){
 		ext4_free_io_end(io_end);
 		iocb->private = NULL;
-		goto out;
+out:
+		if (is_async)
+			aio_complete(iocb, ret, 0);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	io_end->offset = offset;
 	io_end->size = size;
-	io_end->flag = EXT4_IO_UNWRITTEN;
+	if (is_async) {
+		io_end->iocb = iocb;
+		io_end->result = ret;
+	}
 	wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->dio_unwritten_wq;
 
 	/* queue the work to convert unwritten extents to written */
@@ -3813,9 +3823,6 @@ static void ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb
 	list_add_tail(&io_end->list, &ei->i_completed_io_list);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
 	iocb->private = NULL;
-out:
-	if (is_async)
-		aio_complete(iocb, ret, 0);
 }
 
 static void ext4_end_io_buffer_write(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ