linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fsldma: add support to 36-bit physical address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:43:12 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur.tabi@...il.com>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsldma: add support to 36-bit physical address

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> wrote:

> This doesn't control allocation (it probably should with
> dma_alloc_coherent, though I don't see it in the code), it controls
> whether swiotlb will create a bounce buffer -- defeating the point of
> using DMA to accelerate a memcpy.

But it would do that only for the 'dev' used in the dma_set_mask()
call.  That dev is only used here:

	chan->desc_pool = dma_pool_create("fsl_dma_engine_desc_pool",
					  chan->dev,
					  sizeof(struct fsl_desc_sw),
					  __alignof__(struct fsl_desc_sw), 0);

Since we don't DMA the descriptors themselves, I just don't see how
this patch does anything.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/