lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100921144413.abc45d2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:44:13 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] writeback: Do not sleep on the congestion queue if
 there are no congested BDIs or if significant congestion is not being
 encountered in the current zone

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:52:39 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:

> > > This patch tracks how many pages backed by a congested BDI were found during
> > > scanning. If all the dirty pages encountered on a list isolated from the
> > > LRU belong to a congested BDI, the zone is marked congested until the zone
> > > reaches the high watermark.
> > 
> > High watermark, or low watermark?
> > 
> 
> High watermark. The check is made by kswapd.
> 
> > The terms are rather ambiguous so let's avoid them.  Maybe "full"
> > watermark and "empty"?
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately they are ambiguous to me. I know what the high watermark
> is but not what the full or empty watermarks are.

Really.  So what's the "high" watermark?  From the above text I'm
thinking that you mean the high watermark is when the queue has a small
number of requests and the low watermark is when the queue has a large
number of requests.

I'd have thought that this is backwards: the "high" watermark is when
the queue has a large (ie: high) number of requests.

A problem.  How do we fix it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ