[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikbM17xs41abm+6DTa9DJLYM8XYeVg=bZr_n8M5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:17:43 -0500
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-vfs tree with the cifs tree
Alternatively - I could merge the trivially modified bkl cifs patch
into the cifs-2.6.git tree if that is easier
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bkl-vfs tree got a conflict in
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c between commit d090dbeacd3763845d83d5de4d85aad025a28677
> ("cifs: Allow binding to local IP address") from the cifs tree and commit
> b8f05b0b9ea89cfaf6759b1eb47fff683e7016a5 ("BKL: Remove BKL from CifsFS")
> from the bkl-vfs tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> index 52e89ea,4e273f7..0000000
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> @@@ -35,8 -35,6 +35,7 @@@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/freezer.h>
> - #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> +#include <net/ipv6.h>
> #include "cifsfs.h"
> #include "cifspdu.h"
> #define DECLARE_GLOBALS_HERE
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists