[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20100921061310.GA11526@localhost>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:13:10 +0800
From: Kenneth <liguozhu@...wei.com>
To: greg@...ah.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with debugfs
Hello, Mr. Greg,
I'm sorry I had not checked the git before sending my last mail.
For the problem I mention, consider this scenarios:
1. mm/hwpoinson-inject.c create a debugfs file with
debugfs_create_u64("corrupt-filter-flags-mask", ...,
&hwpoison_filter_flags_mask)
2. hwpoison_filter_flags_mask is supposed to be protected by filp->priv->mutex
of this file when it is accessed from user space.
3. but when it is accessed from mm/memory-failure.c:hwpoison_filter_flags,
there is no way for the function to protect the operation (so it simply
ignore it). This may create a competition problem.
It should be a problem.
I'm sorry from my poor English skill.
Best Regards
Kenneth Lee
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:21:12AM +0800, kenny wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> I do not know who is the maintainer for debugfs now. But I think there is
> problem with its API: It uses filp->priv->mutex to protect the read/write (to
> the file) for the value of its attribute, but the mutex is not exported to the
> API user. Therefore, there is no way to protect its value when you directly
> use the value in your module.
>
> Is my understanding correct?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Best Regards
> Kenneth Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists