[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100923143730.6b612a0a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:37:30 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: cdahlin@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] inotify_add_watch_at
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:16:55 -0400
cdahlin@...hat.com wrote:
> I had use for this system call recently when I was trying to monitor a lockfile
> to see when it disappeared. Its semantics are as you'd expect; it has over
> inotify_add_watch what openat(2) has over open(2).
>
> Currently compile-tested only, and missing hookups for arches I don't have
> around.
When adding new syscalls it's nice to include a testcase for the arch
maintainers, please. Paste it into the changelog, add a link to it,
etc.
Also please cc linux-arch@...r.kernel.org so they find out about it
earlier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists