[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C9BC7CE.8020400@riesch.at>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:34:06 +0200
From: Christian Riesch <christian@...sch.at>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] ptp: IEEE 1588 hardware clock support
Alan Cox wrote:
>> It implies clock tuning in userspace for a potential sub microsecond
>> accurate clock. The clock accuracy will be limited by user space
>> latencies and noise. You wont be able to discipline the system clock
>> accurately.
>
> Noise matters, latency doesn't.
Well put! That's why we need hardware support for PTP timestamping to
reduce the noise, but get along well with the clock servo that is
steering the PHC in user space.
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists