linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] Nigel's current for-rafael queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:04:41 +0200
From:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
To:	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"TuxOnIce-devel" <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Nigel's current for-rafael queue

Am Samstag 25 September 2010 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
> Hi Rafael.

Hi Nigel,
 
> Please find attached a slightly updated version of the patchset I sent
> a few months ago. The main change is that I've prepended and additional
> patch which lets the user see the speed at which the image is being
> read and written. This is accomplished by recording the MB/s in a
> single byte in the image header, and using a couple of __nosavedata
> variables to get the data back through the atomic restore. I realise
> the char limits us to 255MB/s at the moment. In future patches, I
> intend to address this by storing the data in a 'proper' image header
> (it's a real problem - TuxOnIce reads and writes on the same set up at
> speeds around 250MB/s).

I like to help by testing these. Is it sufficient to check out your latest 
tuxonice tree, checkout branch for-rafael and switch the hibernate script 
to TryMethod disk.conf?

Thanks,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)