[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285393862.15685.37.camel@yhuang-dev>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 13:51:02 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PCIe / AER: Disable native AER service if BIOS
has precedence (v2) (was: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PCIe / AER ...)
Hi, Rafael,
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:50 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_acpi.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_acpi.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ int pcie_port_acpi_setup(struct pci_dev
> | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
>
> if (pci_aer_available()) {
> - if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(port))
> + if (aer_acpi_firmware_first())
> dev_dbg(&port->dev, "PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
> else
> flags |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
The original per-device firmware_first is overridden by the new global
firmware_first? If it is, why keep the original per-device
firmware_first?
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists