linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] secmark: export binary yes/no rather than kernel internal secid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C9DB5CE.7090305@netfilter.org>
Date:	Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:41:50 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jengelh@...ozas.de, paul.moore@...com,
	casey@...aufler-ca.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter@...r.kernel.org, mr.dash.four@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] secmark: export binary yes/no rather than kernel
 internal	secid

On 24/09/10 22:45, Eric Paris wrote:
> Currently the nfconntrack export code sends the kernel internal secid to
> userspace in a couple of proc files and over netlink as an integer.  This
> is wrong.  This number is a kernel internal.  This patch changes the export
> code to output either 0 or 1 for this value.  A future patch will implement
> sending the name rather than the number in a new field.

I'm not sure why you need this transitional patch if you later on
replace it.

Better to change the /proc output to make it consistent with patch 5/6?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/