linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, nmi: workaround sti; hlt race vs nmi; intr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:30:24 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, nmi: workaround sti; hlt race vs nmi; intr

  On 09/28/2010 05:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/28/2010 01:50 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >  Personally I think the safer route is to take the patch.  There are
> >  other processors besides Intel and AMD and we can't test all of them,
> >  not to mention various emulators and virtual machine monitors out there.
> >
>
> Speaking for the smoltering crater that used to be *Transmeta*, I'm
> (from memory) quite certain they blocked NMI and that this was
> intentional behavior.
>

We'll need:

- Intel
- AMD
- Geode
- Via
- kvm (currently no, but plan to)
- qemu
- vmware
- others?

It should be relatively simple to write a small test case to test this.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/