[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100929004607.GA18362@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:46:07 -0400
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-cris-kernel@...s.com" <linux-cris-kernel@...s.com>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC trollpatch 1/1] genirq: Remove the fits all and nothing
__do_IRQ() code
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:01:51PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Hmm, why isn't chip->unmask() sufficient ?
>
> That's a good question. I'll take a look at what ia64 is doing
> in the ->unmask() and ->end() functions to see if I can fix this
> with some code shuffling.
>
Did you end up solving this? ia64 iosapic and parisc iosapic still look
fairly similar... I hit the same issue of ->end() not being called in
the handle_level_irq path and ended up just folding in the missing bit
to ->unmask (we were already EOI the IOSAPIC, but missing the EOI for
the parisc cpu.)
--Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists