[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26E9B811E137AB4B95200FD4C950886BA64E0ECD@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:20:22 -0700
From: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Wu, Xia" <xia.wu@...el.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhu, Daniel" <daniel.zhu@...el.com>,
"Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@...el.com>
Subject: RE: unnecessary timer interrupt of slab.c and bdi tasks when the
system is in sleep state
> > the slab timer is already deferable... which means it won't hit while
> the system is completely idle.
>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean exactly. The slab work seems to be scheduled
> strictly
> periodically, unless the cpu goes offline. But I can't find any nohz-
> wise adaptation.
>
INIT_DELAYED_WORK_DEFERRABLE(reap_work, cache_reap);
that will cause it to only run when the cpu is actually idle...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists